|
Issues
|
Tertiary68%
|
Secondary13%
|
Other19%
|
|
How did you hear about the conference?
|
90% online
10% off-line (poster, E.L.T. Newsletter, colleagues)
|
50% Online
40% Off-line
10% colleagues
|
70% Online
30% colleagues
|
|
Registration time
|
70% more than 2 months before conf
20% 1 month before
10 % on the day
|
70% more than 2 months before conf
30% on the day
|
30% more than 2 months before conf
30% 1 month before
40% on the day
|
|
Registration process
|
Uncomplicated 70%
Moderately easy 20%
Complicated 10%
|
Uncomplicated 50%
Moderately easy 50%
|
Uncomplicated 60%
Moderately easy40%
|
|
How would you rate the
conference?
|
Excellent 65%
Good 25%
Poor 5% *
(*one of the plenaries was not up to standard)
|
Excellent 40%
Good 60%
|
Excellent 60%
Good 40%
|
|
Main reason for attending?
|
Personal growth and development 85%
Prof. obligation 10%
Other 5%
|
Personal growth and development 100%
|
Personal growth and development 95%
Prof. obligation 5%
|
|
Prior knowledge to the topics addressed?
|
More than 75%: 50%
About 50%: 45%
Less than 25%:05%
|
More than 75%: 25%
About 50%: 65%
Less than 25%:10%
|
More than 75%: 70%
Less than 25%:30%
|
|
Topics addressed relevant to your work/studies?
|
Extremely rel. 30%
Quite relevant 70%
Not at all 0%
|
Extremely rel. 15%
Quite relevant 85%
Not at all 0%
|
Extremely rel. 40%
Quite relevant. 60%
Not at all 0%
|
|
To what extent did the conf improve understanding of topics addressed?
|
More than 75%: 30%
About 50%: 55%
Less than 25%: 15%
|
More than 75%: 15%
About 50% : 85%
Less than 25%: 0%
|
More than 75%: 50%
About 50% : 30%
Less than 25%: 20%
|
|
Succeeded in promoting exchange of ideas/experience btw participants?
|
Yes absolutely 70%
Yes, partially 30%
No
|
Yes absolutely 70%
Yes, partially 30%
No
|
Yes absolutely 80%
Yes, partially 20%
No
|
|
How do you rate blend of theory and practical applications?
|
Excellent 30%
Good 60%
Poor 10%
|
Excellent 30%
Good 70%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 50%
Good 50%
Poor 0%
|
|
How would you rate the workshops?
|
Excellent 30%
Good 50%
Poor 10%
Did not attend 10%
|
Excellent 30%
Good 70%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 20%
Good 70%
Poor 10%
|
|
Has the conf inspired you to consider any follow-up activities?
|
Yes absolutely 50%
Yes possibly 50%
No 0%
|
Yes absolutely 50%
Yes possibly 50%
No 0%
|
Yes absolutely 30%
Yes possibly 70%
No 0%
|
|
Was post-presentation discussion time adequate?
|
Yes absolutely 65%
Yes possibly 25%
No 10%
|
Yes absolutely 50%
Yes possibly 50%
No 0%
|
Yes absolutely 30%
Yes possibly 50%
No 20%
|
|
Did you find the conference material useful?
|
Yes absolutely 60%
Yes partially 40%
No 5%
|
Yes absolutely 20%
Yes partially 80%
No 0%
|
Yes absolutely 40%
Yes partially 60%
No 0%
|
|
Would you have recommended this conference to others?
|
Yes, without hesitation 80%
Yes, with
Reservations 20%
No 5%
|
Yes, without hesitation 70%
Yes, with
Reservations 30%
No 0%
|
Yes, without hesitation 80%
Yes, with reservations 20%
No 0%
|
|
How did you feel about the conference content?
|
Extremely satisfied 45%
Partially satisfied 45%
Dissatisfied 10%
|
Extremely satisfied 25%
Partially satisfied 65%
Dissatisfied 0%
|
Extremely satisfied 50%
Partially satisfied 50%
Dissatisfied 0%
|
|
Rate the venue and facilities
|
Excellent 40%
Good 60%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 80%
Good 20%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 75%
Good 20%
Poor 05%
|
|
Rate food and beverages?
|
Excellent 45%*
Good 55%
Poor 05%
*Lunches were a wonderful surprise
|
Excellent 90%
Good 10%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 70%
Good 20%
Poor 10%*
* More Mediterranean
/local products needed
|
|
Out-of-conference
Organized activities
|
Excellent 70%
Good 30%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 90%
Good 10%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 80%
Good 20%
Poor 0%
Did not attend 10%
|
|
Rate the overall organization?
|
Excellent 60%
Good 40%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 50%
Good 50%
Poor 0%
|
Excellent 70%
Good 20%
Poor 10%
|
|
Did the conference satisfy your reasons for attending?
|
Yes absolutely 75%
Yes partially 20%
No 05%
|
Yes absolutely 60%
Yes partially 40%
No 0%
|
Yes absolutely 70%
Yes partially 30%
No 0%
|
|
Any missing areas from the programme?
|
Comments
We need more practical workshops/aspects/examples
Need for discussion of ESP fundamentals: where we are going and why.
Need more discipline teachers who collaborate with LSP teachers.
Excellent job!
There was a good blend of theory and practice.
Need more languages, other than English.
Really friendly organizing committee!
|
Comments
Make more time for workshops.
Great hospitality.
One session overlapped.
|
Comments
Some topics discussed insisted on theory and not on the applications in class
|